- Relief printing
- Intaglio and planographic printing
- Color printing
- Bits and pieces
- Early photography in silver
- Non-silver processes
- Modern photography
- Color notes
- Color photography
- Photography in ink: relief and intaglio printing
- Photography in ink: planographic printing
- Digital processes
- Where do we go from here?
Art Photogravure

Hand gravure. Paul Strand. Iris. 1928 (Printed by Jon Goodman and Richard Benson, 1978). 9 13/16 x 7 7/8" (25 x 20 cm). Berlin. The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of Richard Benson © Paul Strand Archive, Aperture Foundation, Inc.
When an aquatint  was well made, it provided printing cells that were virtually invisible  to the naked eye. When a gravure resist was properly etched, it not only  described a full range of tones but even allowed their internal  relationships to be adjusted to make the information from the negative  more effective. When both these things happened in a gravure, and the  originating photograph had a fine tonal scale, the result could be more  beautiful than anything else in photography. Yet the tone and clarity  were only part of the reason for this. Much of the glory of photogravure came from its capacity to produce a deep black value on a  totally matte surface. There has long been a war between the glossy  surface and the matte. It began at the very start of photography as the  brilliant, ultimately glossy daguerreotype battled with the soft, matte-surfaced salted-paper print. When paper won the battle with the  decisive tool of the albumen print, it did so with a semigloss surface  that could reveal the long range of tones carried by the new glass  wet-plate negatives. Later on, when the silver-based developing-out  papers came to dominate photography and when chromogenic color papers  were made, gloss surfaces won hands down.
        

