- Relief printing
- Intaglio and planographic printing
- Color printing
- Bits and pieces
- Early photography in silver
- Non-silver processes
- Modern photography
- Color notes
- Color photography
- Photography in ink: relief and intaglio printing
- Photography in ink: planographic printing
- Digital processes
- Where do we go from here?
Duotone letterpress halftone

Halftone duotone print. Alvin Langdon Coburn. The Spider’s Web. c. 1905. 10 1/4 x 7" (26 x 17.8 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of Richard Benson. An untrimmed proof sheet for a plate in Camera Work 21 (January 1908). This duotone shows the register marks at top and bottom that guided the printer in aligning the two impressions.
The simple  halftone aspired to be upper class and to work as a luxurious method for  making beautiful photographic reproductions. Its primary limitations  were in the dot size—always coarse enough to be visible to the eye—and  short tonal scale, imposed by the difficulties of inking and printing a  delicate relief plate. A third problem with the halftone was the absence  of a single halftone negative accurately rendering the full tonal  scale of the photograph. The smooth, even steps of tone in  photographic prints became a rough, erratic set of gradations in the  simple dot-constructed halftone. A partial solution was to print a  picture in more than one impression, using two different halftone  negatives made by photographing the original print twice. The  technology wasn’t too complicated; it required negative images that  were of identical size, which was easy when glass plates were used.
        
Detail of Halftone duotone print. Alvin Langdon Coburn. The Spider’s Web. c. 1905. 10 1/4 x 7" (26 x 17.8 cm). The Museum of Modern Art, New York. Gift of Richard Benson. This letterpress duotone was printed with two colors: a black and a pale green. The green is nearly invisible when examined with a magnifying glass, but gives a distinct green cast to the print. The register mark, never cut off this proof sheet, shows the two inks and their respective screen patterns.
When one halftone  was printed over another a terrible pattern could form called a  “moiré,” which was a frequency-interference pattern between the screens  if they were not exactly aligned. This problem was avoided by tilting  one screen thirty degrees away from the other, a solution that had been  discovered by hand engravers many years before when working with  overlays of linear designs. It turned out that even without much  refinement in the way the halftones were made, a two-impression  reproduction, printed first in black and then in gray ink, could look  far better than any single one.
        The second set of dots in gray ink, even  though they were pale, added  body to the black parts of the picture and  made the areas of middle and  light values much smoother. This new development—the duotone—appeared in art books and other expensive publications where image quality was the first concern. Duotones first showed up at the start of the twentieth century and became common by the 1930s. Extremely  beautiful photographic reproductions were already being made in the  first half of the century by the technique of photogravure, but this intaglio medium was very expensive. The multiple-pass  duotone, though more expensive than a halftone, was still far cheaper  than gravure, so it had a viable role in photographic ink printing. The  presses never really registered the sheets accurately when printing  duotones, but the second impression, being gray, could be a bit out of  alignment and still improve the reproduction. Perfect registration had  to wait for the multicolor offset presses designed to print color for  advertising purposes.
        

